Agenda

  • Provide a broad update/status of recommendations for Ideas4OGC as input to the summary for the Board of Directors meeting

Attendance

  • Stan Tillman
  • Geoff Zeiss
  • Jack Pellicci
  • George Percivall
  • Chris Little
  • Chris Body
  • Dave Danko
  • Paula McLeod
  • Mark Reichardt

Minutes

-
  • TopicUpdateVisionandMission - one additional revision which will be made available by Mark R.
  • Under TopicIntegrateVision, Jeff DLB’s new development process concept has been moved to the Quality and Quantity sub-group under TopicNewDevApproach to ensure it is captured, as per previous agreement
  • For TopicImprove Communications, the recommendation to create a “concise overview” has been captured in the Quality and Quantity topic
  • Need for documentation consistency and leadership via a “Tsar” highlighted as important
  • Recommendations roll up approach connects strategic goals from 2005 to recommendations from the ideas leadership group, as well as identifies actions already underway as per the Business Plan
  • Created themes (example below) to classify recommendations
    • Housekeeping/ lifecycle management includes Human Resources (Doc), tools for Identified different groups with similar comments (etc)
  • Items in Green came from the Ideas leadership team
  • Full document is available on the portal here: https://portal.opengeospatial.org/?m=projects&a=view&project_id=439&tab=2
  • There may be a need for a different type of standard (similar to the ISO PAS standard), that may not be covered in the recommendations in the document and require discussion – place mark.
  • Document for BoD shows progress to date – will be presented as unfinished
  • Chris Holmes papers up on the portal, representing his views on problems – recommended reading (complimentary to ideas approach). Files are here:
  • https://portal.opengeospatial.org/?m=projects&a=view&project_id=439&tab=2
  • General questions (thought provoker) to the group – given the intensity if the process (number of meetings etc), how does the group see the next phase unfolding? Potential priorities mentioned ; self-assessment, Overall Architecture guidance
  • General consensus that the rolled up presentation for the BoD is ready to go and to connect the contents (and other actions underway not mentioned) to the Business Planning process.
  • Comment on implementation of recommendations (topicNewDev approach referenced) – will be difficult an complicated, some may require prototyping to fully understand impacts on the OGC processes
  • TC meeting – will go through recommendations in detail, identify key next steps and initial review of resource requirements

- TrevorTaylor - 19 Sep 2013
Topic revision: r1 - 19 Sep 2013, TrevorTaylor
 

This site is powered by FoswikiThe information you supply is used for OGC purposes only. We will never pass your contact details to any third party without your prior consent.
If you enter content here you are agreeing to the OGC privacy policy.

Copyright © by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding OGC Public Wiki? Send feedback